I'm surprised the daily mail is not up in arms about all the violence and sex in the bible.
They will if they read that.
FFY
The Daily Mail is up in arms about labours plans to teach sex education to the under fives!
Of course Ofsted's ideas for sex education will not just be about the birds and the bees.
'Inspectors have been internally briefed that they can quiz pupils aged four to 11 about the word ‘gay’ and same-sex families, it emerged this week. They have been told to ask young children if classmates are ever picked on for not behaving like a ‘typical girl’ or a ‘typical boy’.
And since 2013 Ofsted briefings have also urged inspectors to tackle ‘transphobic’ bullying, by asking primary children if they think someone ‘born a girl who would rather be a boy, or born a boy who would like to be a girl’ would feel safe at their school.
Labour plans to introduce sex lessons for pupils aged five | Daily Mail Online
More DM outrage-mongering. So much nonsense written. I had sex education at a CoE comp aged ~9 in 1980/81.
I think it the broadness sexual matters at such an early age.
Of course I knew your sex education was exceptionally broad - I only learnt about T-bagging on this forum from one of your posts!
Durham Free School's closure was confirmed last week, and details have since emerged that it's another wacko creationist factory
Brainwashed: Christian school taught Intelligent Design as fact (From The Northern Echo)Exclusive: ‘God designed the solar system,’ says worksheet | Schools Week
So can you put a condom on a banana? Or are you more likely to eat the condom, and coat your member with the banana? I might add that you are a distinguished 'member' on this forum. You post all over the place. Just checking that you aren't an idiot.
Clarification might be needed.
I suspect there are others like that.
we were just taught the basics at 9, about the sausage entering the donut... then nothing until around 13/14, by which time we all knew about "dunkies".