when asked what he did to justify his salary JohnHumphreys couldn't stating that there many people in other walks of life who deserve far more than he ever did but we live in market system blah blah blah as though nothing could or should be done to influence it .Utter bollocks was my reply
And that is exactly why you'll always shout from your armchair on the sidelines. As long as you don't recognise that John is absolutely correct you can continue to "shout" at the stars but they will not move.
as per usual Richard Murphy hits the nail squarely on the head The richest in our society aren’t good value for moneytime for change me thinks
he is correct in as much as that is what is happening but he also recognises something is wrong so it's up to is to elect the right government to force the right changes
I didn't realise you interviewed him.@Fess up, how much do the BBC pay you?
Funny you copy me, yet respond to your own post after I said what I said. You really do ignore and just shift the goal posts don't you.
I'm sure John Humphreys will now feel suitably shamed, and immediately start paying a voluntary 80% tax rate.
Or maybe not.
You really need to stop reading this type of garbage, LGS. You actually believe it to be factual, rather than comedy.
LOL - I actually agree with you. There is no market rate for the BBC. The other media companies operate in a competitive market where failure means the closure of the business. The BBC are financed through taxation, so the rate of pay they are able to afford, bears no resemblance to market forces.
this video shows the sheer idiocy of neo-liberalism put in the simplest of terms .It should be shown in schools right across the land