Why not.In the past we seem to have let in a lot of undesirable idiots.Is it because she is a christian.
I dont think so Marv.But it does make a change from allowing in Islamic fundamentalist terrorists, or child sex offenders who seem to have set up home in Rotherham. I dont think this woman is a threat to us.
Exactly for that reason, we've let in too many of the wrong people already.
To me she is the very type of person that asylum system was set up for. Her life is in danger and is not threat to the british people. She gets my vote.
More to the point: Do you?
At the risk of being reported by your hero Pacifico:
It should be abundantly clear by now that very few people here are part of your "lads, bants and giggles" group.Which doesn't mean your input isn't welcome, but don't try and include us in it
In my opinion we should let her come here but it wouldn't surprise me to see others with simler cases apply to come here. In which cases like immigration we should first see that we have the resources and they are of suitable background to come here. If we get one or two a year fine but if we're getting large numbers applying at the same time then I think we should turn them away.
Totally agreed. She should claim asylum.
She has served 8 years in prison on what seem like trumped up charges.Like kilvil pointed out she seems like the type of person that asylum was set up for.
Sadly the situation says a lot about Pakistan.
my mum always said that when she ran from the kgb security the most scared was in the police station and they discussed taking her back. she knew it would be a death sentance on a return. as it was she never got to see her family again.
Why is everyone else the UKs problem?