The question was, do you want to stay or leave the EU, not do you want to leave but only if we like the deal we got.
If we're being pedantic, were we asked whether we wanted to leave, or whether we wanted to leave and never, ever rejoin?
Given it was the former, there's no reason why we shouldn't have a referendum every six months just to check. Or failing that, not have any referendums at all and let Parliament do its job.
Sure at £142 million a go it's not like we have something better to spend the money on 
Works for me.
When you factor in the £350m a week we're going to be better off, we can afford it 
We could have two a week and still have some money left over 
Based on the fact that we voted last June to leave, we havent even left yet and already people are remoaning about having another referendum, I'd say every ten years would be more than sufficient. 
No it doesn't. If the EU knows there will be a second referendum and they want us back to pay their bills, then they would have a huge reason to give us a bad deal.
Remoaners? Seriously?
That's what everyone calls them on Facebook