|
I'm worried now, no-one told me I looked silly with my D750 as a non-pro sightsetting photographer! I feel well...silly now, I didn't realise I was embarrassing everyone around me.
I do have m4/3 and APS-C mirrorless setups but by the time I've added a lens to the bodies, I don't find there's much practical difference in size and weight plus the Sony's in particular can be badly unbalanced with their tiny bodies paired up to massive lenses. I do like the RX100m4 as my compact option and toying again with an RX10m4 even though the m2 hasn't worked out for me but ultimately I don't find going smaller than the D750 is worth the tradeoff for my use. I still end up using a similar backpack (whereas the RX100 will fit in a small pocket) and aside from video, the D750 is just such a superb camera.
I feel comparisons with lenses like the Nikon F2.8 zooms are unfair because with a FF DSLR you already have a one or two stop advantage on the sensor so micro 4/3 and e-mount lenses can't match that anyway. If you're at the point you *need* an F2.8 lens on a FF sensor then a smaller sensored camera is likely not to be much use at all.
John |
|