|
We have to disagree, then ( snerkler, post 17 ). - As I understand a landscape is mainly trees ,or rocks and so on, across a wide field of view. Using a moderately wide-lens the DoF will be considerable even a couple of stops down, when focussed at the first scale-mark after infinity.... near-enough the hyperfocal distance ( without resort to charts/calculations ). A photo taken in a formal garden where some objects may be close ( perhaps to emphasis the scale of the garden ), would not be a landscape, even though some of the content is at a considerable distance, compared with the closest objects.
This style of picture would indeed need some effort to achieve all parts sharp.
I believe that a landscape picture implies the objects are at a considerable distance - trees in a parkland. Even if thete is an attractive path leading to the distance, the need to have it all sharp will have an effect on the image quality as snerkler suggested.
In effect, you can't have it all.However, I'll agree that a remote shutter-release ( or the built-in timer), will eliminate mechanical shake if used with a tripod... something that SLRs suffered, with their heavy mirrors - hence the Canon pelicule... and more recently Sony ( digital) used a similar semi-mirror arrangement - However, with modern "Live" LCD viewing, there is nothing mechanical, except the photographer pushing the release. By placing the camera on a wall, using the self-timer should be considered, whenever possible, eliminating any induced shake. If the weight of a tripod is unacceptable.
- Er, unless that's a required effect.
Personally I try to carry a long-monopod, this allows use of the "Sweep Panorama mode" which stitches five frames together in the camera - the resulting image is considerably wider than any "wide-angle" yet without the distortion of a "Fisheye" . The only snag being if movement is close-by, then it can feature in more than one place..... some care is needed to inspect the frame afterwards - before moving on. If objects are needed sharp in a land (Sea?)-scape as well as infinity, then with modern computing it's easy enough to substitute a close-focussed image of the foreshore with sea and ships on the horizon.
Cheers. |
|