|
"Better" in what way...? If you have some specific requirement, perhaps you can spell it out in a bit more detail.
I suggest you do not rush to pre-judge or over think something that you haven't even tried yet. Let the supplied router and ISP kit in the telephone exchange do their thing and leave them to "train" the line - it can take a week or two before it "settles" on the optimum performance in terms of speed and reliability (and it may drop the connection a few times whilst it's so doing.) Then live with it for a few weeks and see what you think. You may find it's just fine for your needs and you can just get on with Internetting and life in general.
There is something of an Internet Myth that all ISP supplied routers are inherently inferior, but I just don't buy into it: I'd be willing to bet that BT, Sky, Virgin, et al have between them got an installed base of literally millions of customers who think their supplied routers are just fine.
Once you've tried out what you get for a while, you'll be in a position to take a view on what's not working well enough for you which will thence inform what you need to do to "fix" the problem, including informing any advice you might get through these columns.
For example, if you have Wi-Fi range issues, is will almost certainly be better a better solution (including value for money) to keep your router and invest in additional Wi-Fi cells rather than forklift replace the ISP's router. However, until you've tried it for a while, you won't know whether you have a problem or not.
Equally, if the router isn't maintaining the ISP link very well then, particularly for a new install, it's up to your ISP to fix the problem - you're paying them for the service, they should provide it and if they don't then nag the ISP and (ultimately if needbe) cancel, get you money back and take your business elsewhere. It's not down to you to fix it if the ISP cannot provide the service they've sold you. |
|