|
|
I think these are cameras used for multiple remote-action where they are then Edited after recording. Probably unnecessary where your set-up is more-or-less a fixed indoor studio.
Can we presume this is for interviews/product-selling /training etc. where both the person and a product needs to be filmed? This was not very clear.
People rarely improve being filmed using a WA lens and in general manual focus is preferable, which kinda implies having a separate monitor to check framing, focus and so on. A modest zoom-lens should suit well. If you spend some of your budget on a second camera that will provide Cutaways for the Editor - but they'll need to be skilled if this is a live-broadcast. Mistakes can be removed by Editing after recording and this is IMHO the best route to make sure the Event is snappy = as good as possible.
Joe Fernand asked for more details - and I'd agree, the initial Info was too light.
As to lighting: it is rare not to provide this using 3-point lighting (for any studio set-up), as you want to keep the background light-level lower than the subject to hold the viewers' attention, whilst avoiding shadows either on the subjects - or the background. Similarly the product may need special lighting- especially if it's glossy / very polished. Having a camera with manual exposure-setting will also help. Lighting need not be expensive, but professional LEDs use a different phosphor to the cheaper types . . . this shows in careful examination of the colours.
However, you've not said what experience you have in this.... that may be the most important aspect... along with whoever makes up the "crew".
Perhaps you can also tell us why the PTZ was chosen in the first place?
Cheers. |
|
2-12-2019 02:10:28
Author