|
Wow it's late, I respect those who do not resort to simply attacking other people. I also think it's important to reiterate that oil companies are the common denominator plumped for when trying to dismiss a conflicting opinion and yet apparently those same people choose to ignore the very parties which stand to gain from cap and trade. Let us not misconstrue it, we can't ignore this because it forms the centre of their plans.
It is the very process by which they intend to regulate and essentially ration economic activity. Therefore it's a huge new market for speculators and those purporting to offer "green solutions". Now some of those green solutions will be good, others will be garbage but if the lobbying effectively seals billions in tax payers money being invested in these new companies, then there is another big benefactor.
Also concerning the more general point about scientists, as the poster below me has illustrated it seems that this alarmist tone is taken often. In respect of the latter, well it was obvious who stood to gain and of course to a certain extent it has worked, as it did whip up a frenzy as was evident from this board. Now assuming that the scientists were not in league, then it shows they can be wildly off the mark. If they are off the mark on this issue to, then the cost of their mistake will be a catastrophe for the western world. Some of you seem to be comfortable with this idea that the west will essentially be stripped bare, despite the fact that even the earth having warmed in the last decade is a very contentious issue, as the 2 articles from the same website have illustrated.
However it is the russian roulette playing investment banks who stand to gain the most from this. You can try addressing any point of a scientific nature but your words are undermined by climate gate, when a group of scientists are being asked to delete data because Audit Climate think they can prove x, then we know they are hiding damning information. |
|