|
Actually quite a bit of money has been spent on fusion research over the last 2 or 3 decades, must surely be in the 100s of millions if not billions by now, didn't america put over a billion into it a year or threee ago. I actually did a project on the UKs JET Fusion reactor project something like 15-20 years ago. The problem is no one has really come up with a way to make it work yet, the JET reactor did actually manage to produce several fusion events but nothing approaching a self sustaining reaction suitable for power genration. There are tons of problems, from containment, the initial energy requirements to generate the plasma, instabilities, radiation etc. The thing I remember but never understood is that the plasma 'likes' (not the right word) to exist in a toroid shape and not a ball or sphere like the sun but just about at the point where fusion should happen it apparently 'wants' (again wrong word must be something to do with the plasma physics) to be in a figure eight.
If I remember things they once caused the plasma to try and swtich in the JET reactor and the entire 30 TON reactor lept several inches into the air
Persoanlly I hope someone gets it working or we better start building nuclear reactors like mad (and damn the nuclear waste) because in 30 to 50 years the world is going to be in deep dodo and nuclear reactors take years or even decades to build and get online so if you wait until you really need them it's to late. Renewable energy like wind and solar are great supplements but they are non starters as far as replacing mainline generation because they cannot be relied on for a continuous controllable supply and there is no way to store electricity on that sort of scale yet (forget batteries, they're to inefficient and don't store enough), one reason for the interest in hydrogen as potentially you could dump your spare green energy into producing it and store it for when it's dark, no wind etc then burn, convert it in fuel cells etc |
|