|
I thought most new wind farms were going to be out at sea?
And while I wish you luck if you think you may qualify, what kind of effing lunatic comes up with a policy like that? What is the point of trying to reduce electricity produced by fossil fuels with wind farms and at the same encouraging people to use more electricity by reducing the price? Surely the only sensible way forward is to encourage people to use less (more efficient white goods etc, better insulation) by subsidising efficiency related products and then replacing "bad" electricity with "good" electricity whenever possible.
What happens when its freezing cold and there is no wind? People who were encouraged to spend money on electric heating through subsidies will use more, more coal will be burnt and the overall effect would be negative.
If someone insulates their house more and saves 30% of their energy consumption, that is by far and away the greenest possible result, regardless of where the energy came from.
Another crap idea from whoever. IMO |
|