1234567Next
Back New
Author: MikeTV

Earth Hour - today!

[Copy link]
26-11-2019 03:59:11 Mobile | Show all posts
Hopefully, they will all hold their breaths for one hour. But not between 1.00am and 2.00 am on Sunday morning.

Should solve all our problems at a single stroke !!!
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

11610K

Threads

12810K

Posts

37310K

Credits

Administrators

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

Credits
3732793
26-11-2019 03:59:11 Mobile | Show all posts
Ah well, at least there will be less &*!!%*$ talked for a short, merciful, hour.
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

11610K

Threads

12810K

Posts

37310K

Credits

Administrators

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

Credits
3732793
 Author| 26-11-2019 03:59:11 Mobile | Show all posts
I think it is mainly a public awareness thing, rather than a practical proposition to reduce emissions. An opportunity to discuss the impact our lifestyles have on the environment, and how it will impact future generations.

(ps. it is also interesting to reflect that for most of the population, lights out is the norm. It is mainly the brightly lit west that is doing most damage to the environment, and the darker continents that will suffer the most from climate change.)
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

11610K

Threads

12810K

Posts

37310K

Credits

Administrators

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

Credits
3732793
26-11-2019 03:59:12 Mobile | Show all posts
You didn't bother then?
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

26-11-2019 03:59:13 Mobile | Show all posts
Agreed, it's an awareness issue.

We can still argue over it's relevance and appropriateness. though.

If it were about resource preservation and pollution reduction then I'd be wholeheartedly in favour. It's just that linking it to CO2 misses the point entirely as far as I am concerned.

Linking it to climate change is likely to be off putting and counterproductive as far as most of the global population is concerned (and in my humble opinion, dishonest).

The fact is that the proponents of this exercise think they are going to get more results linking it to a speculative climate scare than linking it to the real indisputable problems of population and per capita resource consumption levels.

Means never were and never will be justified by ends. Dishonesty over either inevitably discredits what would otherwise be a right and virtuous exercise and leads to inappropriate or ineffective counter measures.
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

11610K

Threads

12810K

Posts

37310K

Credits

Administrators

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

Credits
3732793
 Author| 26-11-2019 03:59:14 Mobile | Show all posts
What makes you think that? Of course, I did it. And the more that do, the greater the awareness.
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

11610K

Threads

12810K

Posts

37310K

Credits

Administrators

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

Credits
3732793
26-11-2019 03:59:15 Mobile | Show all posts
Amen, brother.

I'm lovin' your work.
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

11610K

Threads

12810K

Posts

37310K

Credits

Administrators

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

Credits
3732793
 Author| 26-11-2019 03:59:16 Mobile | Show all posts
We'll just have to agree to differ on that stuff.
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

11610K

Threads

12810K

Posts

37310K

Credits

Administrators

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

Credits
3732793
 Author| 26-11-2019 03:59:17 Mobile | Show all posts
You're welcome
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

11610K

Threads

12810K

Posts

37310K

Credits

Administrators

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

Credits
3732793
 Author| 26-11-2019 03:59:18 Mobile | Show all posts
I didn't know that about Jonny, until you mentioned it. But if his main objections are towards anti-nuclear environmentalists, he may have a point. I'm not sure where I stand on the nuclear power issue. It is certainly an interesting debate.
Reply Support Not support

Use magic Report

1234567Next
Back New
You have to log in before you can reply Login | register

Points Rules

返回顶部