|
While I agree that the op is misrepresenting the organisation's aims, this type of attitude, imo, doesn't help. It's condescending and only leads to people digging their heels in deeper.
It'd be much more productive to leave emotion out of it and dismantle innacurate statements analytically and factually. If people on all sides adopted a zero tolerance approach to opinions/statements they don't agree with society overall would get nowhere.
And as already stated, I disagree with the op's inferences as to what the organisation is all about. |
|