|
If you want to call it a referendum, I have no problem with that, but my personal view is a 'People's Vote' is a more suitable summary at this time. Each to their own.
I can't really comment on your assertion that people "didn’t know what they were voting for" in the 2016 referendum but there are different paths ahead and it has been necessary to group them into broad categories to help people understand, hence 'Norway ', 'Canada ', 'no deal' etc. Some of these descriptions came from leavers so, unless they are in denial, I think you final comment is very far from the mark.
The status quo being we keep extending Article 50 until a deal is agreed, revocation is decided upon or a new Parliament is elected that supports 'no deal'. |
|