|
What you think of as minutiae, are just facts. As we will see.
Of course there is a possibility.
But let's take this back.
I pointed out that it isn't the DUP getting this money, but Northern Ireland.
You asked how the money was disbursed, and I pointed out that Westminster currently controls spending in NI, and that spending was subject to checks by the NAO.
And then you pointed to this story as evidence they can't be relied on.
Really? That's your case? That they didn't pick up on a situation that is still unsubstantiated that any wrongdoing took place?
Oh well if that's true, then the NAO are guilty as charged. There will be literally hundreds of things that have not been proven to have happened that they haven't reported on. Clearly they must be incompetent to oversee public spending, what with their reliance on facts and evidence.
The material point is that it is Northern Ireland that benefit, and the constituents they represent.
Ironic to talk about truth when your example is something unproven.
At last something semi relevant. Though again, nothing proven yet as the investigation is yet to conclude.
Luckily, we have a model to assess the possible misuse of future funds. The previous "bung". How was that misused by the DUP? Let's not even insist on proven facts. How much is even remotely linked to any potential scandals.
That would be a big fat zero.
But if anything is proven, I'd expect the full weight of the law to be used against any corruption. But as yet you have nothing. |
|