|
Whilst I'm going through paperwork... one of the more secret aspects on an engine build such as this, is the camshaft. When the guys in the US are racing competitively and every little counts, a camshaft spec is a closely guarded secret.
It's common to see a cylinder firing order swap (No. 4 & No. 7 typically). This serves two purposes; it helps reduce crank deflection under high load (the crank will physically twist from prolonged high energy events) and it allows the motor to reach peak RPM sooner, and run smoother at said high RPM.
Since we're combining the old stuff and the new stuff in terms of technology, a little bit of that crosses over into the TFX motor in the Corvette. The basics of the current camshaft (to be swapped out late next year once some testing's been done - hence this isn't really top secret data as this is a 'just get from A to B' setup:
While the big show cars will have cams with a duration of over 300 degrees, we use something a little more tame. The operating window in terms of RPM can be a moot point as the goal is to get the engine up to 8k RPM as quickly as possibly to ensure maximum fuel pump volume is available. There'll be an RPM dip when 2nd gear is selected, and this can potentially cause damage as the motor will temporarily go into a lean condition from the drop in RPM and hence a reduction in fuel throughput.
Piston(s) would get nipped, which is called 'backsiding' - where the ring land area / skirt gets overheated from the temporary starvation of fuel, causing a lean condition (remembering that the fuel has a role in cooling the motor as well as fueling it). It's common for it to happen on the burnout and any subsequent damage on the run which manifests, can be quite substantial.
Back to cams and stuff...valve spring technology has improved over the years, allowing greater total lift for both intake and exhaust. In this application, .714" lift is fairly large. Anything over .700" in a nitro engine is on the aggressive side. Spring pressure recommendations are a bit of an odd one here, I've always used Manley Nextec springs which had an open pressure North of 1000lbs, so backing it down to just over 600lbs is a change from the norm.
In recent years, the evolution on valve-train elements has centered around push rods and in particular, rocker arms. I'm using standard (albeit racing spec) ratio rockers. More extreme applications will use a higher multiplier on their ratio to achieve greater valve lift i.e. 1.65 vs my 1.57 for example. In some applications you might even see individual rockers with differing ratios i.e. your 8 intake rockers might have differing ratios for specific cylinders, and similar for the exhaust rockers.
This is something that only comes from a lot of R&D and access to blower dynos to assess intake charge in real time. At the nostalgia level, it's not really a thing - the work involved in ensuring a cylinder's combustion is as efficient as possible (all things considered) is approached from the opposite end by using a different lengths connecting rods to provide differing compression throughout the motor (certain cylinders being inherently stronger or weaker by design or as a byproduct of the firing order).
In about a week or so, the body will be on the chassis and it'll be full steam ahead to get the last of the tin-work, chassis and body mounting completed. In the meantime, I'll be starting the bottom end check and re-assembly of the motor next weekend. Piccies and drivel shall follow soon after... |
|