|
|
what I mean by incompatible:
why would brothers dedicate all their life, knowledge and creativity to direct the most horrible vengeance to a person, who has not raped their sister, who has not caused her suicide, who only brought a shame to the victim's family by giving the inconclusive evidence about the rape charges, which made possible to release the accused rich teenagers.
maybe it is a bigger deal to cope with a shame than with death in Korean culture, which is quite understandable, but I doubt that it is the case here.
3 main parties that deserved vengeance: youngsters - whose rape resulted in suicide. next come their wealthy parents, who bribed the autopsy specialist/doctor in exchange of his dying daughter's complex treatment abroad. and finally the dad (autopsy specialist) who took the bribe and did not report full results to the court....
my question is, why the vengeance was not directed to those youngsters as severely as it was towards the autopsy specialist? also, why the people involved in bribe and parents did get away....?
It seems that it was more conveniently fitting the script for the director to make the vengeance more dramatic and shocking.
I think the autopsy specialist should have been made somehow involved either in rape or suicide in order to justify such a violent vengeance towards him who only brought a shame to the family afterwards by stating that it did not seem as rape; she might have had sex with several people willingly due to no damage signs on her sexual organs.
but most importantly, they made a tool out of an innocent child just to make her dad, autopsy specialist, to suffer, to understand the pain... incompatible
score 6/10
winelash 9 October 2014
Reprint: https://www.imdb.com/review/rw3101736/ |
|
26-3-2021 18:05:10