|
|
After watching this movie, my mind compared it with 12 angry men, the main reason being that the movie focuses on arguments starting from scratch and getting to a reasonable conclusion. None of the two movies try to solve the case. They just try to draw conclusions from facts. The climax can be interpreted in multiple ways. Personally speaking, making a 65 minutes movie is itself a daring attempt. And it'll definitely keep you hooked the whole time. And the music! Man! A great score for a thriller! Especially the intro and end credit song! Can't get it out of my head!! Anyone reading this, go for it. Movies like this should be watched and praised so that they keep creating such cinema. Kudos R Arvind!
SPOILER AHEAD :- Regarding the climax, I think that the novelist & the cop are the same person and he is just trying to prepare himself for a possible upcoming interrogation by conducting a mock interrogation before actually committing the crime. This means that the whole movie is in fact an imagination of his mind. I can say this because - (a) The cop is not seen after the novelist realizes his mistake & (b) Both the characters are played by the same person. Brilliant move Arvind! Looking forward for more!!!
score 9/10
vsmrox 13 October 2017
Reprint: https://www.imdb.com/review/rw3830157/ |
|
21-3-2021 11:16:03