View: 116|Reply: 0

Why does the Sci Fi Channel hate sci-fi fans?

[Copy link]
18-3-2021 18:05:17 Mobile | Show all posts |Read mode
Seriously. I mean, alienating one's fan-base can't be the wisest business decision to make. And while I'm pretty sure making a genuinely entertaining movie isn't the easiest thing in the world to do, it can't be THAT difficult, either; it DOES get done, after all, at least occasionally. Nor is there a shortage of decent science fiction, horror and fantasy writers--amateurs and otherwise, all of whom would jump at a chance to create an original, intelligent storyline.

So why do the "good folk" at SFC continue to spring garbage like "Nature Unchained: Avalanche" on us?

Wooden acting. Implausible premise. Illogical plot. So-so CGI's. Incomprehensible interpersonal relationships. Pointless characterizations. Dialog that would have to improve to be cliché.

Makes a long-term fan of the genre wanna cry.

But all that aside, there is one good thing I can say about this turkey dropping, something that actually made me go, "huh; lookee there". It involves what is laughingly called a "spoiler" (how does one "spoil" something this rotten?), namely: the Lead Young Guy makes it with a HOMELY chick, not the blond bimbo! No, really; and to top it off, the Homely Chick--a scientist, of course--has only got two toes on one foot (the others were taken off by frostbite, I think)! And they SHOW it!

Now that's slightly different.

score /10

capn_crusty 16 October 2004

Reprint: https://www.imdb.com/review/rw0948934/
Reply

Use magic Report

You have to log in before you can reply Login | register

Points Rules

返回顶部