View: 102|Reply: 0

93 minutes wasted

[Copy link]

11610K

Threads

12810K

Posts

37310K

Credits

Administrators

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

Credits
3732793
28-2-2021 18:06:07 Mobile | Show all posts |Read mode
Far too often Hollywood pushes the appeal of sequel money too far and make a piece of crap movie, this is one for sure.

I can forgive an obvious plot and, if the action sequences are done well can even overlook relatively poor acting, but when all three are preset plus they throw in poor cinematography then I feel robbed. Don't get me wrong, if I choose to go see a sequel such as this with no-name actors (and I think one was a professional wrestler), then shame on me if I expect anything more; but if I don't warn others what they are in for then double shame on me.

But I always try to see some positives in my reviews (this is only my third), so if you like cheap B action movies with big guns and the jungle that will allow you to pass 1 1/2 hours then give it a go. Just be warned that your time may have been better spent watching something like "Enemy at the Gate" or the original "Behind Enemy Lines" for a second or even a third time.

score 2/10

Finbar-1 12 January 2014

Reprint: https://www.imdb.com/review/rw2940229/
Reply

Use magic Report

You have to log in before you can reply Login | register

Points Rules

返回顶部