View: 66|Reply: 0

Draw Blood!

[Copy link]

11610K

Threads

12810K

Posts

37310K

Credits

Administrators

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

Credits
3732793
25-2-2021 06:05:34 Mobile | Show all posts |Read mode
Listen to the Warren Zevon jokes fly…

The secret to telling stories in any media, be it books, plays, TV or movies, is to make the audience care about the characters. The hero of `Werewolf of London,' Wilfred Glendon (Henry Hull), manages to earn our sympathy: he's a botanist obsessed with his studies to the point where he neglects his beautiful young wife Lisa (Valerie Hobson). His ordered life disintegrates when he is attacked by a werewolf in Tibet; he realizes he is doomed to the lycanthrope's savage curse at the same time his wife begins flirting with an old flame, Paul (Lester Matthews).  The logical foundation of Glendon's life flies apart, and he came face-to-face with his brutal animal nature.

`Werewolf of London,' like most of the classic Universal horror pictures, is heavy on atmosphere, lots of shadows and fog.  The transformation sequences and the makeup are good, although not as proficient as `The Wolf Man' six years later.  The Werewolf of London struck me as a more sinister creature than the Wolf Man in his deliberateness.  The Werewolf would even wear a sort of disguise as he stalked the streets of London, using his intelligence, whereas the Wolf Man was a more savage, animalistic force that attacked anyone nearby.  It makes you wonder who would win a fight between the two…

And, as is usual for the old Universal horror films, the acting is very good.  Henry Hull moves from stuffy academic to tortured soul, and brings us along for the ride (reminiscent of Basil Rathbone's deterioration in `Son of Frankenstein.') Valerie Hobson is luminous as always, and Warner Oland is quietly menacing as Dr. Yogami, who has an inside knowledge of `werewolfery.'

`Werewolf of London' will probably always be in the shadow of its successor, and rightfully so.  There's nothing wrong with `Werewolf,' but there also isn't anything here that `Wolf Man' doesn't do better.  It's just part of the horror evolution, a lesson well learned.

score /10

Shield-3 19 September 2001

Reprint: https://www.imdb.com/review/rw0014536/
Reply

Use magic Report

You have to log in before you can reply Login | register

Points Rules

返回顶部