Very biased

GHCool

I don't listen to rap.  The only thing I knew about Tupac Shakur before I saw this movie is that he had been shot a few years ago.  After seeing this movie, I understand that Tupac had a life worth making a documentary about, but I did not like the approach the filmmakers took.  I really wanted to like this movie.  Parts of it were really well done, but it was so biased that I cannot honestly recommend it.  It was more like a commercial for Tupac's image than a documentary on his life.

Its amazing how many interviews Tupac gave in his life.  We can see that he was an intelligent and affective storyteller.  However, a person's life cannot be understood just by the way that person sees him or herself.  A person's life also needs to be judged by other people's points of views. This could have been a great film if only the filmmakers had shown interviews with important people in Tupac's life such as his mother, his sister, his teachers in school, the artists he rapped with, his producers, etc.  It was also a little difficult for a person unacquainted with Tupac's life and the world of gangsta rap music to fully understand the time line in which these events occurred.

I liked the visual style of the film though (especially that 3D effect a lot of the photographs had).  Those helicopter shots in Las Vegas and of the Golden Gate Bridge were beautiful too.  Overall, TUPAC: RESURRECTION is a flawed film that had a lot of potential.

My grade:

5 out of 10

score 5/10

GHCool 23 November 2003

Reprint: https://www.imdb.com/review/rw0908346/