View: 128|Reply: 0

The show's bias and soft facts hurt its credibility.

[Copy link]
5-11-2020 22:01:02 Mobile | Show all posts |Read mode
While Ventura attempts to draw viewers in with an often aggressive 'I'm going to get to the bottom of this' attitude, the show's research methodology and lack of hard evidence beg ridicule. Those sources interviewed by the show tend to lack credibility, such as an accredited degree in the subject matter, and few such sources are able to provide any verifiable evidence. On occasion, the show triumphs by denying the conspiratorial claims and, in so doing, brings them further ridicule. However, the show consistently provides inflamed or outright false information when representing their claims. I have found that this show can be quite useful as a tool for sharpening one's critical thinking skills. Such skills are not taught in the show, but can be exercised by attempting to prove or disprove that which is demonstrated by Mr. Ventura and his team.

score 2/10

danielbbutts 1 June 2013

Reprint: https://www.imdb.com/review/rw2806104/
Reply

Use magic Report

You have to log in before you can reply Login | register

Points Rules

返回顶部