View: 94|Reply: 0

Improper use of History Channel

[Copy link]

11610K

Threads

12810K

Posts

37310K

Credits

Administrators

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

Credits
3732793
18-10-2020 13:29:12 Mobile | Show all posts |Read mode
A big disclaimer missing from this film, that is "Based on true events".

It gives wrong impression to audiences who are familiar with the history of the underlying intent for inserting erroneous info. Is it just bad info? Or is there an alternate motive to feed wrong info to audiences not intimate with history judging from the remarks made by the modern influential men?

Since this film was distributed via History Channel, the inaccurate info take away 5 points. If it was simply someone's attempt to make drama based on true events, this score would have been higher.

This film cannot even be regarded as historical documentary. At best, a recount of PERSONAL perspectives, understanding and ideals of some history. It would probably be more enjoyable if it tried to learn from Elon Musk version of MARS TV show.

However, if the intent is to spread personal view, belief and agenda into audiences who don't care much about history, this may be the piece to create alternate reality for them.

score 5/10

sleepyhat 21 January 2017

Reprint: https://www.imdb.com/review/rw3624432/
Reply

Use magic Report

You have to log in before you can reply Login | register

Points Rules

返回顶部