CrackDown
Publish time 2-12-2019 21:25:47
I caved in on betting and spread a tenner very thinly on these outsiders:
Fred Couples 50/1 - £1 EW
David Toms 125/1 - 50p EW
Ryo Ishikawa 200/1 - 50p EW
John Huh 125/1 - 50p EW
KJ Choi 55/1 - £1 EW
Kevin Na 125/1 50p EW
Trevor Immelman 66/1 - £1 EW
I thought Immelman was probably the best pick from that group. Previous winner and at -5 already.
EDIT: Me and my stupid mouth, he's just gone and bogeyed.
[email protected]
Publish time 2-12-2019 21:25:47
Big news today will be a DQ for Tiger. I will shocked if they figure out how he gets away with an illegal drop on 15
But its the Masters and they are generally a law unto themselves.
soupdragon
Publish time 2-12-2019 21:25:48
Are you sure - How was it illegal?
soupdragon
Publish time 2-12-2019 21:25:48
Just been reading about tiger, by admitting he dropped 2 yards from original spot I guess he should be DQ
Wildkarrde
Publish time 2-12-2019 21:25:48
Pathetic penalty. Anyone else would have been disqualified, makes a mockery of the penalty handed to Guan.
'Rules are rules' said Tiger, aye, one rule for you and one for the others.
soupdragon
Publish time 2-12-2019 21:25:48
Yes, should have been packing his bags this morning. The loop hole used to give him 2 stroke penalty doesn't fit with what he did. This wasn't trial by TV for something previously missed during normal course of play, tiger clearly just misinterpreted the rule and therefore dropped illegally and signed his card wrong = DQ
Wildkarrde
Publish time 2-12-2019 21:25:48
Agree 100%. You know, as well as i do, that anyone else would have been out.
soupdragon
Publish time 2-12-2019 21:25:49
Without doubt, even the high profile McIlroy would have went I'm sure.
CrackDown
Publish time 2-12-2019 21:25:49
Flipping the coin, if this had happened to any other player and he only got a 2 shot penalty, there wouldn't be so much controversy. So much Tiger hate, I hope he goes on to win.
soupdragon
Publish time 2-12-2019 21:25:49
Your maybe right, but when it's the world no1 the spotlight is always there. I still think he should have been disqualified but the committee have put their stance out which I just watched on Sky and they have stated their case well. They have exercised their right to keep him in which is within the rules, but they shouldn't have used that right IMO. I like Tiger and birdie at the 1st shows the strength of the man, pure class.
I would be glad to see him win but routing for McIlroy Westwood and Garcia 1st 