Wow what a cockup from Channel 4 News! Dreaded F-word for them //static.avforums.com/styles/avf/smilies/facepalm.gif
mnrrnt on Twitter
Behind all these attacksyou can explore "reasons" why people do it etc. The world lost its plot years ago . We the west need to step back and mind our own business .But until we stop funding and supplying these wars.groups and people etcnothing will change .Its a "game/business " to many .And thats wrong.
What we all should do now is SUPPORT the Muslim community and allow it to be part of uswithout the hate and fear .
That's what they were all armed with or similar and they use 9mm rounds too which is a huge round with huge kinetic energy. I'm sorry but that's not true there. Do you know how many feet per second such a round would be traveling.
Mark duggan was shot with a 9mm hollow point round which is designed to expand on entering the chest and cause severe internal damage. It would be like a 20cm projectile going through your chest at over a thousand feet per second. It leaves an exit wound too. As they shot this guy today 4 times he would not have survived.
People statistically won't survive more than one shot of such a weapon/round, let alone four shots. The chances of dying of blood loss are huge too. Many people who have shot themselves by mistake with shotguns in limbs etc, die of blood loss, if the situation isn't dealt with quickly. I know this being into clay shooting and that's why you have to be so careful with guns.
Please can everybody be nice today, especially you Choddo
More likely to be a G36c, Ammo type chosen to try and reduce 'exits" if possible
Some still like the MP5but they have not had new stock for years and most of them "rattle " a bit ! But they do work .
Choudhary is in prison.I live near prominent far right winger it's not exclusive the womble vitriolic nonsense. The only difference is Choudhary and cohorts have vast back catalogue of recent and current British military interventions to build and spout their propaganda narrative.
No you don't accept the risk of your own citizens dying. If you do then you condone it, if you do that, you think it's acceptable. And if you do that you.... well you know where we are going.
I'm absolutely dumbfounded that you post these comments, on a day like this, and espouse this view. The decisions our government takes are by the way of how we as British citizens act (or should) towards each other. The lady who has been killed today on that bridge maybe had no interest in politics.
We deal with the risk by eliminating it and views like yours which play into the hands of people who think it's acceptable and are radicalised enough to do it.
Really , you think our behaviour is not a reason for people to want to hurt us back ?
I have no desire to be blind or toothless in this dystopian future. Radicalised there's a thing...
At no point has anyone inferred it's acceptable to commit terrorism or that they want to accept the risk of citizens dying - which would be practically impossible to negate anyhow. You are making huge baseless leaps, linking one thing to the next until you reach your own skewed take on the original statement which resembles absolutely nothing like your transmogrified final interpretation.
You throw around baseless accusations of what others are implying when in fact the only person making ridiculous insinuations is yourself.