Werewolfs
Publish time 26-11-2019 02:58:51
http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2017/07/20/dup-responds-to-theresa-mays-call-for-equal-marriage-in-northern-ireland/
DUP not really there yet. But we can forget our principles if it means we get a majority. How did the saviour Mr Reece Mogg vote on gay marriage?
krish
Publish time 26-11-2019 02:58:51
It is a devolved matter.
The Tories called for gay marriage and legislated for it in England.
Being in a confidence and supply arrangement makes no difference to any of this.
Bl4ckGryph0n
Publish time 26-11-2019 02:58:51
I think we can guess ...
MP Jacob Rees-Mogg tells Tory activists he is 'not proud' of gay marriage lawTelegraph typo ...
Jacob Rees-Mogg: the Conservative backbencher with an online cult followingHere's one such cult ...
https://www.avforums.com/attachments/20170803_192237-jpg.893663/
Jacob Rees-Mogg Invites Moggmentum Tattoo Man for Tea at Commons - Guido Fawkes
Toko Black
Publish time 26-11-2019 02:58:51
I find it a real shame that in 2017 it still has to be discussed, but not as sad as that there are still people around who want to control how others can/cannot live.
IronGiant
Publish time 26-11-2019 02:58:52
I would agree, but with an addendum to your statement:
"not as sad as that there are still people around who want to control how others can/cannot live where it effects no one else other than themselves and consenting adults"
The state nor anyone else should be able to dictate what we want to think or do in private or that we choose to do to ourselves as long as we are not clinically mentally impaired and a danger to ourselves and others.
Examples, sexuality, beliefs, recreational drug use, risky or dangerous sports etc.
The State should be able to control how we live with regards to the impacts of actions or innactions that do have an effect on others, specifically those that are unwelcome by those effected.
Examples, stealing, assault, unreasonable nuisance etc.
Laws, rules and social pressures to conform to a certain lifestyle based on controlling the moral behaviour of individuals which include those that effect no one else tend to be by and large religiously based. There are examples of non religious ideologies where a persons private affairs are controlled, but they tend to be very rare, extreme and certainly for Western societies, anachronistic anathemas*.
We still however have a soft spot for religion, especially for those that were historically integral to our political and legal systems of power and influence.
To this day we make exception and exemptions for religious groups and bodies from equality laws even with regard to who they employ in tax payer funded schools.
* Historic examples of totalitarian communism for example that are generally considered to be failed, disastrous and often abhorrent events in human history. There are still a few examples of communist states like China, but even they are changing if slowly.
Bl4ckGryph0n
Publish time 26-11-2019 02:58:52
Offspring 3: "Dad, I have two things to tell you:
"I don't want to eat meat and I'm gay" "
Me: "For fudges sake, you don't want to eat meat?"
Sonic67
Publish time 26-11-2019 02:58:52
Celibate then 
apolloa
Publish time 26-11-2019 02:58:52
There's a joke there.
Bl4ckGryph0n
Publish time 26-11-2019 02:58:52
Hmm notes comment was deleted for apparent 'trolling', and also notes comments made after are worst....
I guess you can't ask a simple question or post an opinion on this thread? Don't want open discussion?
apolloa
Publish time 26-11-2019 02:58:52
Without knowing what the comment was it is impossible to discuss  I guess it was directed to a Mod?