I suspect what Boris says and what Boris does will be two entirely different things. But that's fine because "it's Boris".
The Labour position is they will have no democratic mandate. Ergo it doesn't matter who is elected and why they can articulate their position now.
Opposite post to @crashcris
Only one person for me, Rory.
Great sense of duty with an impressive history of dedicated public service. Not a politician, while also not one of those numerous cliche "not a politician" gobsh*te populists.
After hearing Esther McVey on LBC yesterday, I'm even less impressed by the former mediocre TV presenter turned mediocre and lying politician than I originally wasn't. I wince a tad whenever she delivers (the word) Brexit as Brexeuuueuuth.
Boris - let's finally have a leaver delivering on leave.
But he's so terrifyingly fugly. "Something of the night" wouldn't even begin to describe him.
https://www.avforums.com/attachments/27214-itok-vi4oz0pt-jpg.1154691/
Yeah but I usually don't select my preference for a leader/PM on fudgeability
Guardian grudgingly admitting it.
Boris Johnson’s bid for Tory leadership gathers momentum
If you want to attract new/younger voters any party would be stupid not to appreciate the value of fudgeability. Even Corbyn has a sort of "Gilf" about him, not for me but the Glastonbury type crowd (young voters) go nuts for him even with all the anti-Semitism, and terrorist hugging. Boris has the "Dilf" going for him.
But they do. So your interpretation of what labours position is not accurate.
Yep only one for me amongst that bunch of clowns is Rory Stewart.
Hunt, Johnson and McVey the worst of that bunch. Obviously Johnson is gonna contend, but hopefully McVey and Hunt at least get nowhere near the final nominations.