People of faith follow the Holy books. Many of the terrorist attacks are because people believe they are carrying out Gods will. Seconds after, we hear the confirmation they are followers.
How about being a ‘real’ Christian? Have you read the Bible too and seen the amount of rubbish spouted throughout that?There are quite a few Christians too last time I checked.
Why Mark Anthony Conditt – a white Christian – isn't called a terrorist | Daniel José Camacho
It depends on whether they are coming to say “jesus is gay” or “kill all unbelievers” .
Islam and the far left seem to use violence and disorder to stifle any criticism if the religion. So the powers that be take the easy option of banning or not letting things be discussed so as not to cause any uproar.
I’m not sure you can generalise an entire religion as using violence to stifle criticism.Maybe “Islamic extremists” is a better choice and in the same way, “Christian Extremists” are equally guilty of the same so they’re all just as bad.
But on the decision to ban her it was because she"present a threat to the fundamental interests of society" by Border Force.
No mention of extremists.
That’s the legal terminology used by the UK Border Force.Isn’t it just non-specific to cover anyone blocked from entering the UK for the reason given?
You only need to look at her history/YouTube page to describe her as an ‘extremist’.
The big question is would she be banned from the UK for saying Jesus was gay or not?
If the U.K. Border Force deemed that her stunts and rants were cause for concern then yes.If you look at the Wikipedia link I shared earlier, you’ll see that there are as many white/Christian extremists banned from entering the U.K. as brown/Muslim extremists.
Of course I have and there's a lot of nonsense in it, especially the OT.
The difference is that Muslims do, or are meant to, believe every word of their fiction.
You can be a perfectly good Christian and not believe in most of the bible.
In fact most Christians care only about small parts of the NT.