"Quartic", iirc - and no, I never had one 
I just googled allegro interior and that image came up , always been a ford guy so my knowledge of austin cars is limited, but for balance lets compare this to the Mustang convertible https://www.avforums.com/attachments/austin-allegro-estate-1-jpg.1051240/
I've seen a few mustangs around now and I still don't get it. They just look like a big corporate coupe. The Ford Mondeo version of the 4-series, C-class Coupe or Lexus RC.
/proxy.php?image=https://www.topgear.com/sites/default/files/styles/16x9_1240w/public/news-listicle/image/5thirtykcoupesmagjune2016.jpg?itok=37of0qOD&hash=685f4797a0057037c86568664ff35643
If you something that stands out, buy an Elise.
Try going away for a weekend in an Elise with kids etc in tow.
I don't think the idea of a Mustang is to stand out really, what it offers is RWD, a nice big V8 engine in a (ok subjectively) good looking body. There aren't many cars out there that offer the same, certainly not at 30k.
But it was your post above that contained the image?A good attempt at a custom Allegro convertible, but still not a (even slightly) handsome car.
I was referring to the post comparing a mustang interior to an austin allegro , googled allegro and that was the first clear interior picture I got , I thought the odd steering wheel was just a phase they went through for press attention , it wasn't on the whole production run
Sorry, didn't re-read the thread so had forgotten about that.
no problem, it has got a bit confusing but I think from the pictures I provided the 2017 mustang has little in common with a 70s BL product other than having the same control system 
MPG
at the moment it's averaging about 23 , I've seen 30 on the computer , I've also seen 8 