|
I can't help with advice about costing it yourself, but the sales pitch from GSHP people does seem to consistently give an overly rosy picture.
As I understand it, the efficiency of the system, COP, depends on the difference between the ground temperature and the output temperature from the pump.
So, the sales-bunny will quote you for say, a ground temperature of 10C (or whatever) and an output temp of 45C and will give you an impressive sounding COP that can then be shown to give you great savings.
However, realistically for heating you will need a much higher output temperature, unless you have absolutely state of the art insulation. This higher output temperature will badly skew the COP and then all the other figures on which you have based your choice will start to collapse like a house of cards.
Throw in the cost of the system and depreciation, along with running costs and maintenance and the equation becomes much more difficult.
One area where air source heat pumps really seem to be holding their own and producing impressive results is with heating swimming pools.
It may be that your best option is along the lines of an air source heat pump for most of your heating needs, but a tacit acceptance that it will have to be backed up with electric heating during really cold snaps.
The trouble with this is that the future costs are guesswork. Oil and gas seem certain to rise considerably. Wood pellets are anybody's guess.
Peat - presumably you are not going to tell any environmentally active friends that you are burning peat?
Electricity will always be available, since society will collapse without it so it will always be an option, but at what price?
Personally if the costing works, I would opt for an Air Source heat pump with a pellet burner back up.
But that is what would suit me and may not be an option. |
|