|
|
My above comment is NOT because I dislike silents--in fact, I have probably reviewed more silent films than just about anyone on IMDb. No, this is just a case where the later version is just more interesting--probably due to its "Pre-Code" sensibilities that gave a lot more psychological depth to the story. However, none of the versions I have yet seen really come close to the quality of the original book--a common problem when you adapt classic stories to the screen.
This is a very famous horror film starring John Barrymore. I have heard and read raves about his performance and how great he was without the use of significant amounts of makeup. Although I love Barrymore, I really don't agree and think he overacted. Now this didn't ruin the film--for a silent it's still very good. It's just that other silent horror films such as NOSFERATU or THE PHANTOM OF THE OPERA are just better and the acting is a bit more restrained. However, despite this, the sets are good and action just fine, so this would still be a decent film to watch.
By the way, there are MANY versions of this film since it's in the public domain. I have a videotape with no accompanying music (yuck) and got a DVD from the library with BAD organ accompaniment. If it's available, try to find one with a better score--the music I heard was just very flat and uninspiring.
score 8/10
MartinHafer 22 January 2007
Reprint: https://www.imdb.com/review/rw1580497/ |
|
25-2-2021 05:01:33