The poorest 20% of households have done better than the top 20%. Or any other quintile.
How is that money "flowing upwards"? Income inequality has fallen since 2010.
Given the choice between someone as useless as May and Steptoe and the Semtex Kid, I'll take May any day even though she should be locked up for treason.
What about the poorest 20% and the richest 1%?
"Quintile" - I've learned a new word I'll never use. Thanks!
Here are some lovely stories to warm your heart about Tory economic policy:
A landmark study has linked Tory austerity to 120,000 deaths
Austerity really has hit poor people hardest – the figures prove it | Jonathan Portes
Austerity kills: this week’s figures show its devastating toll | Owen Jones
There's plenty more if you care to look, or maybe it's just easier to deny everything and carry on shopping?
Even Phil "The Kill" Hammond says it's not working.
So who's right, you or him? If it's you, one of you's in the wrong job!
What about them?
The top 1% have a lower share.
Household income inequality, UK - Office for National Statistics
New experimental statistics show the richest 1% of the population’s share of total household disposable income was 7.1% in FYE 2018, largely unchanged over the past seven years, and below the level seen in FYE 2008 before the economic downturn
I'll stick to facts and ignore dubious "reports" about austerity killing 120k if it's all the same.
Income inequality has fallen over the last ten years. Fact.
The poorest 20% have increased their disposable income more than the top 20%. Fact.
The top 1% of the top 1% perhaps has done well. But otherwise no, the biggest contributors have been milked more...Some of us know and it is sickening to see the amounts being deducted.
One of the two has a reason to spin facts...guess who?
Don't know why @BobbyMac marks that post as sad. Are you saying the ONS is not correct? Have you got better information?