Well, there is no agreement that is agreeable  It was voted down 3 times. And the point I highlighted plays a big part in that. Don't get why you keep on going on about trust, trust has no meaning in this context.
Your previous comment 'Trust has nothing to do with anything when there are agreements involved. The agreement take precedence over any kind of trust that may or may not be there. It’s an irrelevance.' plus your latest comment above implies that a proposal can be made which is 100% agreeable to both parties and that ratifying it would be no problem to either of them. If that is the case, where is this ` dead-cert, no-strings-attached, no-trust-required' proposal? It doesn't so far exist and I am sure that if anyone can come up with one before 31/10/19 they will be hailed a hero.
Flipping heck you are hard work. That is because the draft withdrawal agreement that was put forward contained clauses that aren’t agreeable. No point signing something that is not agreeable and just trust that it will never be used.
Have you ever contracted for something? This really isn’t rocket science.