paul_haakonsen Publish time 14-4-2021 05:02:18

Not going to be a groundbreaking revolution in the horror genre...

When I got the chance to sit down and watch "Ghosts of Darkness", it was without knowing a single thing about the movie. I didn't know what it was about, nor did I know who was starring in the movie. I only knew, well assumed actually, that it was a horror movie based on the DVD cover.

The story in "Ghosts of Darkness" was actually quite alright. The movie just suffered from being a low budget movie, you know what I mean here if you actually sit down to watch this movie.

The CGI in the movie was rather questionable, but of course that was to be expected from a movie such as this, given the production value and the budget of the movie.

The acting performances were good, and the few actors and actresses on the cast list did carry the movie quite well.

"Ghosts of Darkness" was weighed down by a predictable outcome of the storyline.

The house itself was quite interesting and had lots of character, and that was actually one of the best things about the movie.

All in all, "Ghosts of Darkness" is hardly worth the time or effort, as there are far, far better horror movies available to pick and choose from.

score 4/10

paul_haakonsen 18 June 2018

Reprint: https://www.imdb.com/review/rw4207817/35892
Pages: [1]
View full version: Not going to be a groundbreaking revolution in the horror genre...